<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tweet Overload: Acknowledging the Elephant In the Room</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interaction.ixda.org/proposals/discussions/tweet-overload-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interaction.ixda.org</link>
	<description>Feb 4-7, 2010, Savannah, Georgia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:20:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caroline Maessen</title>
		<link>http://interaction.ixda.org/proposals/discussions/tweet-overload-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline Maessen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interaction.ixda.org/?page_id=702#comment-228</guid>
		<description>I very much like your topic. My experience with &quot;Debunking myths about the human brain and multitasking&quot;:

I lecture at the Avans University of Applied Sciences in Breda, the Netherlands. Since my students follow the bachelor programme &quot;communication and multimedia design&quot;, I tended to approve that students (18+) used their laptops during my speech. I knew, however, that they were using msn and other communication means. I used to test their ability of multitasking by questioning them about what I was telling just before. I&#039;ve come to the conclusion that their multitasking abilities are very poor, although they believed to be very succesful multitaskers. 

On the other hand: when I&#039;m under the impression that my 7 year old daughter hasn&#039;t heared my explanation on why I don&#039;t want her to do X and I check, she always perfectly repeats the full sentence.....
Maybe the early &quot;digital natives&quot; are not yet fully operational multitaskers, but they certainly are getting better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much like your topic. My experience with &#8220;Debunking myths about the human brain and multitasking&#8221;:</p>
<p>I lecture at the Avans University of Applied Sciences in Breda, the Netherlands. Since my students follow the bachelor programme &#8220;communication and multimedia design&#8221;, I tended to approve that students (18+) used their laptops during my speech. I knew, however, that they were using msn and other communication means. I used to test their ability of multitasking by questioning them about what I was telling just before. I&#8217;ve come to the conclusion that their multitasking abilities are very poor, although they believed to be very succesful multitaskers. </p>
<p>On the other hand: when I&#8217;m under the impression that my 7 year old daughter hasn&#8217;t heared my explanation on why I don&#8217;t want her to do X and I check, she always perfectly repeats the full sentence&#8230;..<br />
Maybe the early &#8220;digital natives&#8221; are not yet fully operational multitaskers, but they certainly are getting better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Schaffer</title>
		<link>http://interaction.ixda.org/proposals/discussions/tweet-overload-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interaction.ixda.org/?page_id=702#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I think your proposed topic is interesting ... and your comment that Twitter is just the latest example is critical. Yes, I agree you should include content about the effectiveness of multitasking. This recent item in the NYT was interesting: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/weekinreview/30pennebaker.html 

It sites a study published in the August 24 edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 

As a &quot;business guy&quot;, I have been struck with the number of communication technologies that each information worker must cope with minute-to-minute in their job. Of course the basics ... phone and email. Many companies now include chat applications as part of the core desktop. Add mobile-phone based interactions (and the immediately interrupting &quot;walkie-talkie&quot; style communicators). 

The core question are the social / cultural expectations, and how a company (or any organization) establishes norms of behavior. Should every phone call be answered? If not, must every voice-mail message be returned? Does each email require a response? To: vs. CC:? Aliases or groups? Under what circumstances may I ignore a specific medium? It&#039;s all about the norms. 

Good Luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your proposed topic is interesting &#8230; and your comment that Twitter is just the latest example is critical. Yes, I agree you should include content about the effectiveness of multitasking. This recent item in the NYT was interesting: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/weekinreview/30pennebaker.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/weekinreview/30pennebaker.html</a> </p>
<p>It sites a study published in the August 24 edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. </p>
<p>As a &#8220;business guy&#8221;, I have been struck with the number of communication technologies that each information worker must cope with minute-to-minute in their job. Of course the basics &#8230; phone and email. Many companies now include chat applications as part of the core desktop. Add mobile-phone based interactions (and the immediately interrupting &#8220;walkie-talkie&#8221; style communicators). </p>
<p>The core question are the social / cultural expectations, and how a company (or any organization) establishes norms of behavior. Should every phone call be answered? If not, must every voice-mail message be returned? Does each email require a response? To: vs. CC:? Aliases or groups? Under what circumstances may I ignore a specific medium? It&#8217;s all about the norms. </p>
<p>Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Portigal</title>
		<link>http://interaction.ixda.org/proposals/discussions/tweet-overload-acknowledging-the-elephant-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Portigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interaction.ixda.org/?page_id=702#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Perfect. I got sucked into a weird frenetic tweeting experience at Interaction09. It was very exciting, but I felt very guilty for stepping so far outside the in-room experience (admittedly I have a short attention span) but fascinated by the intensity of the dialog online and how it was relevant and continued to the hallway conversations; on one hand it felt like we created more conversation; on the other hand, it was definitely not living up to things I value like being present, being here, etc. etc. Can&#039;t wait to see this presentation, especially if mellophone is included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect. I got sucked into a weird frenetic tweeting experience at Interaction09. It was very exciting, but I felt very guilty for stepping so far outside the in-room experience (admittedly I have a short attention span) but fascinated by the intensity of the dialog online and how it was relevant and continued to the hallway conversations; on one hand it felt like we created more conversation; on the other hand, it was definitely not living up to things I value like being present, being here, etc. etc. Can&#8217;t wait to see this presentation, especially if mellophone is included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
